arXiv 2026: Topology matters: a cautionary case study of graph SSL on neuro-inspired benchmarks

At JNS 2025, I presented a poster that is I think as close as I can get to what I think is neuroscience research. I attempted to follow-up that research to see how much it can hold up, and the one in that poster involved data from a single individual only. Using simulated data, I recognized that my method has insufficiencies. I tried to submit it to a workshop at a large AI conference, but unfortunately it was not accepted there. I decided that I may not be able to continue this work further, so I might as well submit this to arXiv. I am glad I've got friends willing to give this work a look, provide their feedback, and put their names behind this work. Their confidence in me and support are very important to me.

A visualization of my embedding showing some separability (i.e., potential interpretability?)

For a copy of relevant materials (e.g., presentation, paper) or any questions you may have, please feel free to reach out to me through the Contact Me gadget on this blog's sidebar.

Details

Title: Topology matters: a cautionary case study of graph SSL on neuro-inspired benchmarks

Authors: May Kristine Jonson Carlon, Su Myat Noe, Haojiong Wang, Yasuo Kuniyoshi

Venue: arXiv

Date: February 3, 2026

Abstract

Understanding how local interactions give rise to global brain organization requires models that can represent information across multiple scales. We introduce a hierarchical self-supervised learning (SSL) framework that jointly learns node-, edge-, and graph-level embeddings, inspired by multimodal neuroimaging. We construct a controllable synthetic benchmark mimicking the topological properties of connectomes. Our four-stage evaluation protocol reveals a critical failure: the invariance-based SSL model is fundamentally misaligned with the benchmark's topological properties and is catastrophically outperformed by classical, topology-aware heuristics. Ablations confirm an objective mismatch: SSL objectives designed to be invariant to topological perturbations learn to ignore the very community structure that classical methods exploit. Our results expose a fundamental pitfall in applying generic graph SSL to connectome-like data. We present this framework as a cautionary case study, highlighting the need for new, topology-aware SSL objectives for neuro-AI research that explicitly reward the preservation of structure (e.g., modularity or motifs).